ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Multidisciplinary Evaluation of an AI-Based Pneumothorax Detection Model: Clinical Comparison with Physicians in Edge and Cloud Environments.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence as a second reader for pneumothorax detection: redirecting rather than reducing chest CT use.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate and timely detection of pneumothorax on chest radiographs is critical in emergency and critical care settings. While subtle cases remain challenging for clinicians, artificial intelligence (AI) offers promise as a diagnostic aid. This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluates a deep learning model developed using Google Cloud Vertex AI for pneumothorax detection on chest X-rays. Methods: A total of 152 anonymized frontal chest radiographs (76 pneumothorax, 76 normal), confirmed by computed tomography (CT), were collected from a single center between 2023 and 2024. The median patient age was 50 years (range: 18-95), with 67.1% male. The AI model was trained using AutoML Vision and evaluated in both cloud and edge deployment environments. Diagnostic accuracy metrics-including sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score-were compared with those of 15 physicians from four specialties (general practice, emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, radiology), stratified by experience level. Subgroup analysis focused on minimal pneumothorax cases. Confidence intervals were calculated using the Wilson method. Results: In cloud deployment, the AI model achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.99), sensitivity of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.00), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.97), and F1 score of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.00). Comparable performance was observed in edge mode. The model outperformed junior clinicians and matched or exceeded senior physicians, particularly in detecting minimal pneumothoraces, where AI sensitivity reached 0.93 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.97) compared to 0.55 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.69) - 0.84 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.92) among human readers. Conclusion: The Google Cloud Vertex AI model demonstrates high diagnostic performance for pneumothorax detection, including subtle cases. Its consistent accuracy across edge and cloud settings supports its integration as a second reader or triage tool in diverse clinical workflows, especially in acute care or resource-limited environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.