ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Development and Validation of an Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy Tool.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health literacy in the workplace plays a crucial role in preventing work-related diseases and injuries. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument to measure Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy (ASHL) based on existing occupational health literacy tools. Methods: The development of the instrument involved preliminary item development, expert evaluation, and preliminary testing. Cronbach's α, a coefficient that measures the internal consistency of each item, was measured for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to examine the construct validity, and predictive validity was evaluated using paired Results: The overall Cronbach's α for the instrument was 0.92, indicating high reliability. In the exploratory factor analysis, five factors were extracted explaining 64.4% of the total variance. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) was shown as GFI=0.851, adjusted GFI=0.816, comparative fit index=0.901, normed fit index=0.835, root mean square error of approximation=0.071, and χ Conclusion: This study describes the development of an instrument for understanding ASHL for use in evaluating the health and safety of farmers. The developed instrument will be used in Korea to improve the health behavior of farmers and to prevent and manage various health problems that may occur in the agricultural working environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.