Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40693168›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Development and Validation of an Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy Tool.

Gyeong-Ye Lee, Ki-Soo Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gyeong-Ye LeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-7324
Ki-Soo ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5571-3639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health literacy in the workplace plays a crucial role in preventing work-related diseases and injuries. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument to measure Agricultural Safety and Health Literacy (ASHL) based on existing occupational health literacy tools. Methods: The development of the instrument involved preliminary item development, expert evaluation, and preliminary testing. Cronbach's α, a coefficient that measures the internal consistency of each item, was measured for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to examine the construct validity, and predictive validity was evaluated using paired Results: The overall Cronbach's α for the instrument was 0.92, indicating high reliability. In the exploratory factor analysis, five factors were extracted explaining 64.4% of the total variance. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI) was shown as GFI=0.851, adjusted GFI=0.816, comparative fit index=0.901, normed fit index=0.835, root mean square error of approximation=0.071, and χ Conclusion: This study describes the development of an instrument for understanding ASHL for use in evaluating the health and safety of farmers. The developed instrument will be used in Korea to improve the health behavior of farmers and to prevent and manage various health problems that may occur in the agricultural working environment.

Indexed as

agriculturehealthliteracysafety

Identifiers

PMID40693168
PMCPMC12278981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.