ArticleJournal of oral & maxillofacial research
The Utility of Evaluating Primary Stability of Implants Using Accumulated Insertion Torque Values: a Preliminary Study.
Article in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Reduced Cortical Bone Compression by Implant Macrogeometry on Peri-Implant Bone Healing: An In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Passive fit evaluation of implant superstructures by analyzing the accumulated screw tightening torque.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Passive Fit Evaluation of Implant Superstructures by Analyzing Accumulated Screw Tightening Torque: A Dental Technique.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This preliminary Material and Methods: Implants of different sizes (42-10ST and 37-6ST) and simulated bone blocks of different densities (D1 to D4) were used. The implant osteotomy was prepared following the manufacturer's drilling protocol in simulated bone blocks, and the implants were inserted (n = 10). The implant insertion torque value was measured at 0.05 seconds intervals. The peak value was recorded as the peak torque value (PTV), and the sum of the torque values measured from the start to the end of the implant insertion was recorded as the accumulated torque value (ATV). After implantation, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured. Correlations among ATV, PTV, and ISQ were analysed. Results: The ATV increased with the density of the simulated bone block. A strong correlation was observed between the PTV value and ATV value (42-10ST [P < 0.05, r = 0.99], 37-6ST [P < 0.05, r = 0.99]). In addition, a correlation was observed between the ATV and ISQ ISQ (42-10ST [P < 0.05, r = 0.81], 37-6ST [P < 0.05, r = 0.83]). The PTV was higher in the 42-10ST group than in the 37-6ST group from D1 to D4. Conclusions: The accumulated torque value varied according to the density of the simulated bone block, and a correlation was observed with the existing implant stability evaluation method. This suggests that this method may be useful as a novel approach for evaluating primary implant stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.