ReviewJournal of oral & maxillofacial research
The Effect of Local Simvastatin on Alveolar Bone Regeneration, Pain, and Swelling After Tooth Extraction: a Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Demystifying Nanotherapeutic Modalities: Unravelling the Mysteries from Antibiofilm Mechanisms to Regenerative and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Histomorphometric Evaluation of Socket Preservation Healing Using Xenogeneic Bone Substitute Combined with Statin: A Prospective Split-Mouth Clinical Pilot Study.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the effects of local simvastatin on alveolar bone regeneration, pain and swelling after tooth extraction, with a minimum follow-up of two months. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) database to identify studies published between January 2015 and January 2025 containing a minimum of 20 sockets per study to evaluate the effect of local simvastatin in promoting bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Data synthesis in test and control groups included following parameters: Extraction socket filling material and method, regenerated bone morphology, pain, and swelling. Quality and risk-of-bias assessment were evaluated by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: A total of 628 articles were screened, with 6 articles meeting the inclusion criteria and being utilized for this review. A total of 326 sockets with different types were evaluated, the effect of local simvastatin on the morphology of regenerated bone showed statistically significant (P < 0.05) progressive improvement in most cases. Furthermore, pain and swelling assessments revealed a decrease in the test groups compared to the control groups suggesting that local simvastatin may promote bone regeneration while reducing post-treatment discomfort. However, different tools were used to measure regenerated bone morphology pain and swelling, making it hard to draw consistent conclusions about patient comfort. Conclusions: Local simvastatin application promotes bone regeneration without increasing pain or swelling, supporting its use as a safe and effective supplement in regenerative bone treatment after tooth extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.