ArticleBJUI compass2025
A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of En-bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with a history of radiation therapy or high intensity focused ultrasound for management of organ confined prostate cancer with review of the literature.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in managing patients with a history of organ-preserving treatments (OPT: Radiation Therapy - RT, High Intensity Focused Ultrasound - HIFU) for Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer (OC-PCa). Methods: We reviewed men undergoing "en-bloc" HoLEP between July 2017 and December 2023 from our institutional database to identify those with a history of OPT for OC-PCa (study group). A 1:2 matched-pair analysis was performed comparing these patients with a control group of men undergoing HoLEP for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) without prior OPT. Demographic, perioperative and postoperative voiding parameters up to 1 year, as well as complications, were compared between groups. Unpaired t-tests were used for parametric variables and Wilcoxon Rank tests for non-parametric variables. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 660 patients, 15 had prior OPT before HoLEP. The time between OPT and HoLEP ranged from 3-month to 12-year. Associated urethral stricture and/or extensive prostatic calcification were present in five patients. Demographic and preoperative parameters were similar between the groups. However, the study group patient had significantly less resected tissue and higher rate of urinary incontinence at 3-month. Two patients (13.3%) continued to experience incontinence at 1-year. There was no clinically significant difference in postoperative improvement in voiding parameters amongst both groups. Conclusions: HoLEP in patients with history of OPT for treatment of OC-PCa is associated with a higher risk of transient urinary incontinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.