ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
SHAP combined with machine learning to predict mortality risk in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of machine learning models for hemoglobin prediction in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of PASI100 response to secukinumab in patients with psoriasis: a real-world study with SHAP interpretability analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of renal anemia in elderly patients on maintenance hemodialysis.Medicine · 2025Observational
- A machine learning-based predictive model for 48-week hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon α-2b: prediction at week 24.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis face a high mortality rate, yet effective tools for predicting mortality risk in this population are lacking. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning model to predict mortality risk among maintenance hemodialysis patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 512 maintenance hemodialysis patients treated at The Central Hospital of Wuhan between January 2021 and October 2024. The dataset included 50 feature variables. The data were split into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). Five machine learning models-Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest Neighbor-were trained and evaluated for predicting patient mortality risk, using metrics such as the F1 score, precision, accuracy, AUC-ROC, and recall. SHAP values were used to assess the contribution of each feature in the best-performing model. Results: The K-Nearest Neighbor model achieved the highest AUC-ROC of 0.9792 (95% CI: 0.9600-0.9929). SHAP analysis identified key factors influencing predictions, including dialysis duration, creatinine levels, white blood cell ratio, blood phosphorus concentration, and unconjugated iron. Conclusion: The K-Nearest Neighbor model demonstrated high efficacy in predicting mortality risk among hemodialysis patients. SHAP analysis highlighted critical risk factors. While these findings show promise for future clinical research, they should be interpreted with caution due to the study's retrospective design and the need for external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.