ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Conservative Treatment for Frozen Shoulder Is Effective Regardless of the Severity of Symptoms.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the recovery duration of pain and functional activity after conservative treatment, including oral medication, injections, and rehabilitation, for frozen shoulder among patients based on the severity of their symptoms. Methods: The study involved patients with new reports of shoulder night pain considered more severe than daytime pain and limited range of motion between January 2021 and December 2021 at the Tokyo Sports and Orthopaedic Clinic. Patients with recent shoulder treatment, a history of shoulder injury, rotator cuff tears, arthritic changes, or shoulder trauma were excluded. After dividing patients into 3 groups by severity of stiffness (group 1, severe; group 2, moderate; and group 3, mild), we recorded retrospective data on range of motion and details of conservative treatment, such as oral medication, injection frequency, and physical therapy, each time the patient visited. Results: The study included 113 shoulders from 106 patients (39 men and 67 women), with a mean age of 54 years (range, 43-75 years). For night pain treatment, median recovery time was 1, 1, and 0.5 months for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with no significant difference. Group 1 used oral medication and injections significantly more than groups 2 and 3 ( Conclusions: Conservative treatment is effective for the treatment of frozen shoulder. In this study, it improved night pain within a month and enhanced range of motion significantly within a year. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.