ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Arthroscopic Knotless Double-Row Transosseous Equivalent Repair Is a Viable Option for Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the clinical outcomes of large and massive rotator cuff tears treated with a knotless double-row transosseus equivalent repair. It is hypothesized that there would be statistically significant improvement in pain, range of motion, and function over time. Methods: Patients who had an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (Current Procedural Terminology code 29827) performed by a single surgeon at a community-based hospital were reviewed over a 32-month period. Patients were included if their tear measured more than 3 cm in the coronal and sagittal planes based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and if they had a repair using a knotless transosseous equivalent technique with suture tape. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Clinical evaluation was performed using shoulder functionality tests, Constant score, and University of California, Los Angeles score. Postoperative ultrasonography was performed and reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Data were compared preoperatively versus postoperatively using the Wilcoxon rank test. Results: Thirty-two patients met inclusion criteria with an average age of 64.4 ± 8.7 years. The average tear size on coronal magnetic resonance imaging T2 imaging was 4.0 ± 0.7 cm and on sagittal imaging was 4.2 ± 1.8 cm. The average follow-up was 2.5 ± 1.1 years. At the 2-year follow-up the average pain had improved from 7.3 to 0.8 ( Conclusions: The arthroscopic double-row transosseus equivalent repair is a viable option for repairing large and massive rotator cuff tears with significant improvement in pain, active range of motion, functional outcomes and a high rate of radiographic healing. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.