Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Risk factors for mumps in children under 15 years of age during the transition from single-dose to two-dose MMR vaccination strategy: a matched case-control study.

Huaxian Liu, Yan Xie, Zhongkui Zhu, Yuanbao Liu, Yang Yu, Jintao Wang, Lu Shen, Yunke Qian, Wanqin Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Huaxian Liu *Department of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Yan Xie *Department of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Zhongkui ZhuDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Yuanbao LiuDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Yang YuDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Jintao WangDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Lu ShenDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Yunke QianDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.
Wanqin TangDepartment of Expanded Programme on Immunization, Taizhou City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Taizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for mumps in children under 15 years of age during the transition from a single-dose to a two-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine strategy, providing a scientific basis for public health policies and interventions. Methods: From the China Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) Information System, 547 children aged 0-14 years diagnosed with mumps in Taizhou City between 2021 and 2023 were included as cases. Controls were matched 1:1 and surveyed by the same investigator. Results: The analysis included 547 matched case-control pairs (343 males and 204 females) of children aged <15 years. The median age of the matched case-control pairs was 72 months. Among cases, children aged 49-72 months accounted for the highest proportion (28.52%). The multifactorial study showed that longer local residence (OR = 0.548, 95% CI 0.403 ~ 0.744), history of Mumps Component Vaccine (MuCV) (OR = 0.103, 95% CI 0.036 ~ 0.297), and belief that children would not get mumps (OR = 0.197, 95% CI 0.121 ~ 0.319) reduced the risk of mumps infection. In contrast, families with multiple births (OR = 1.926, 95% CI 1.405 ~ 2.640), being cared by someone other than parents (e.g., grandparents, babysitters, relatives or staff at a childcare center) (OR = 4.366, 95% CI 2.417 ~ 7.888), a higher level of the most frequently visited hospital (OR = 2.012, 95% CI 1.490 ~ 2.716), going into a crowded indoor place without wearing a mask (OR = 1.699, 95% CI 1.237 ~ 2.334), believing that mumps is not an infectious disease (OR = 1.782, 95% CI 1.274 ~ 2.492), believing that the disease is not serious (OR = 1.507, 95% CI 1.260 ~ 1.802), and believing that MuCV cannot prevent mumps (OR = 2.052, 95% CI 1.451 ~ 2.901) increased the risk of mumps infection. Conclusion: For mumps prevention and control, targeted interventions should prioritize children aged 4-6 years and high-risk populations, including short-term residents, multi-child families, and childcare settings. Guardians should be encouraged to gain accurate knowledge about mumps and the protective effects of vaccination to mitigate vaccine hesitancy, ultimately controlling mumps outbreaks in the population.

Indexed as

Measles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMumpsVaccinationAdolescentCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRisk FactorsMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccinechildren under 15 years of agematched case-control studyMMR vaccination strategymumpsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40692881
PMCPMC12277324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.