ArticlePeerJ2025
Assesment of bone healing after surgical management of odontogenic cysts utilizing fractal analysis-a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Odontogenic cysts, originating from inflammatory or developmental processes of the tooth germ epithelium, represent the most common intraosseous pathology in the head and neck region. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate bone healing following the surgical removal of odontogenic cysts using fractal analysis. Materials and Methods: Bone changes in 17 patients who underwent cyst enucleation were assessed using fractal dimension and lacunarity measurements on digital panoramic radiographs obtained before and six months after surgery. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, paired Results: At six months postoperatively, bone structure differences had largely normalized. In the cyst center, there were no statistically significant differences in fractal dimension or lacunarity ( Conclusions: Fractal analysis offers valuable insights into bone regeneration and may surpass traditional radiographic evaluations. Despite limitations such as small sample size and potential subjectivity in region of interest (ROI) selection, the results support the utility of fractal dimension and lacunarity in tracking bone healing after cyst surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.