ArticleERJ open research2025
Implications of reference equations for interpretation of spirometry in three African countries: a cross-sectional study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimorbidity and health-related quality of life after tuberculosis treatment in Zimbabwe: A cross-sectional study with household comparators.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Lung function trajectories in children with pulmonary TB and non-TB lower respiratory tract infections.IJTLD open · 2025Article
- Spirometry interpretation in Africa: bridging the gap with relevant reference equations.ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) and American Thoracic Society recently endorsed a race-composite spirometry reference equation ("GLI Global"). Africa (outside North Africa) is not represented in the underlying dataset; GLI Global has not been evaluated in the region. We evaluated the fit and diagnostic implications of GLI and African (identified by scoping review) reference equations in three East/Southern African countries. Methods: Among healthy participants from a tuberculosis household contact cohort study in Mozambique, Tanzania and Zimbabwe (age ≥10 years) with post-bronchodilator spirometry we calculated forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Results: In total, 806 healthy people had good-quality post-bronchodilator spirometry. Across GLI equations, "African American" fitted best (mean±sd FEV Conclusions: Reference equations have clinical and public health implications that demand careful consideration, particularly in resource-constrained environments. Use of GLI Global may result more people being identified as having lung function impairment. Further work that includes clinical outcomes is needed to ensure that GLI Global is globally representative. The key limitation of this work is the potential for people with undiagnosed respiratory disease to have been included in the analysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.