Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025

Global, regional, and national prevalence and determinants of volunteer work: a meta-analysis study using survey data.

Samuel Manda, Nada Abdelatif, Dineo Seabe, Sollie Millard, Tapiwa Kamuruko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel MandaDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Nada AbdelatifBiostatistics Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Dineo SeabeThe Nelson Mandela School of Public Governance, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sollie MillardDepartment of Statistics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tapiwa KamurukoVoluntary Advisory Services Section, United Nations Volunteers (UNV), Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: While there is an increasing recognition of the role of volunteer work in promoting global development, the factors influencing volunteering at both global and regional levels remain poorly understood. This study employed a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of volunteering and to investigate variations in volunteer rates by gender, educational level, and age, both globally and at regional and country levels. Methods: We analyzed data from 49,458 volunteers aged 15 and older across 37 World Values Surveys (WVS) conducted between 2000 and 2018 in 31 countries. Random-effects meta-analysis was employed to calculate the overall prevalence of volunteering and to compare volunteer rates among different demographic groups: females vs. males, individuals with at least a secondary education vs. those with primary education or less, and individuals aged 35 years or older versus those under 35 years. Results: The overall pooled prevalence of volunteering was found to be 39.93% (95% CI: 33.25-46.62). Significant disparities in volunteering rates were observed across regions and countries, with the highest rates recorded in Africa (61.15%, CI: 50.54-77.77) and the lowest in Europe (28.97%, CI: 19.43-38.51). Rates varied considerably, from a low of 19.16% in Russia (CI: 19.16%-22.76%) to a high of 80.27% in Tanzania (CI: 77.99-82.55%) and 72.00% in Uganda (CI: 69.18-76.22%). Volunteering in religious organizations was the most common type, accounting for 16.77% (CI: 13.76-19.78), followed by community and health organizations at 14.62% (CI: 11.74-17.50). Regional differences were notable, with the highest rates of religious volunteering in Africa at 41.09% (CI: 20.17-62.02) and the lowest in Europe at 8.10% (CI: 5.25-10.95). The pooled relative risks for gender, educational, and age differentials were (RR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.97); (1.20, CI: 1.18-1.36); and (1.00, CI: 0.95-1.05), respectively, indicating that only educational differentials significantly affected volunteering rates. The impact of education on volunteering was more pronounced in Europe (1.54, CI: 1.21-1.97) compared to Africa (1.17, CI: 1.03-1.33). Conclusions: Volunteering rates vary significantly by region and country, often correlating with individuals' educational levels. These findings are essential for policymakers aiming to enhance volunteer initiatives. By understanding the regional contexts and factors, such as the influence of education level on volunteering, policymakers can develop tailored programs that attract new volunteers and promote retention, ultimately fostering greater community engagement and social cohesion.

Indexed as

data sources (DS)meta-analysisnon-profitSDGsvolunteering

Identifiers

PMID40692828
PMCPMC12277244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.