ArticleWearable technologies2025
Novel magnetometer-free inertial-measurement-unit-based orientation estimation approach for measuring upper limb kinematics.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses challenges in sensor fusion for accurate and robust joint orientation estimation in human movement analysis using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs). A magnetometer-free refined Kalman filter (KF) approach is presented and validated to address various indoor environmental constraints and challenges posed by human movement. These include variability in motion and dynamics, as well as magnetic disturbances caused by ferromagnetic materials or electronic interferences. Our proposed approach utilizes a Kalman-filter-based framework that analyzes the accelerometer's alignment with the Earth's frame to estimate orientation and correct gyroscope readings, eliminating reliance on magnetometer inputs. The algorithm was tested on both controlled robotic movements and real-world upper-limb-motion-monitoring scenarios. First, a comparative analysis was conducted on the double-stage Kalman filter (DSKF) and complementary filter using the collected robot motion encoder data. The results demonstrated superior performance in orientation estimation, particularly in yaw measurements, where the proposed method significantly improved accuracy. It achieved a lower root mean square error (RMSE = ) and mean absolute error (MAE = ), outperforming both the DSKF and complementary filter approaches. Additionally, the study's findings were validated against a standard motion capture system, revealing error metrics within generally acceptable ranges ( of the joint range of motion [ROM]) and strong correlation coefficients (). However, some deviations were observed during complex motion cycle intervals, highlighting opportunities for further refinement. These findings suggest that the proposed approach presents a promising alternative for human joint orientation estimation in industrial settings with magnetic distortions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.