Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692781›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

The prognostic power of major pathological response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: a multi-center cohort study.

Shuhan Xie, Shijie Huang, Zilu Tang, Hai Zhang, Jinxin Xu, Sunkui Ke, Jinbiao Xie, Rongyu Xu, Ying Chen, Zhinuan Hong and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuhan Xie *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Shijie Huang *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Zilu Tang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Hai Zhang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Gaozhou, Guangdong, China.
Jinxin Xu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Sunkui KeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jinbiao XieDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Rongyu XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital, Quanzhou, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Gaozhou People's Hospital, Gaozhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhinuan HongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Mingqiang KangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC), neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) constitutes an innovative therapeutic strategy. However, The relationship between its short-term efficacy and long-term prognosis requires further clarification. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of major pathological response (MPR) in ESCC patients receiving nICT. Method: This is a retrospective multi-center study enrolling 306 ESCC patients undergoing nICT. The primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and recurrence patterns. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to address heterogeneity between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were utilized to analyze survival difference. Results: 144 achieved a MPR, while 68 achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Cox regression analysis identified MPR as an independent prognostic factor [HR = 0.48, 95%CI= (0.28 - 0.82), P = 0.007]. Survival analysis demonstrated that MPR patients experienced significantly improved RFS compared to non-MPR patients, before (P<0.001) and after PSM (P = 0.016). Importantly, the RFS of MPR patients was comparable to that of pCR patients (P = 0.319 in the unmatched cohort; P = 0.456 in the matched cohort). Furthermore, adjuvant therapy did not provide additional recurrence-free benefits for MPR patients. Compared to pCR patients, MPR patients exhibited a similar recurrence rate, with similar recurrence sites. Conclusion: MPR represents a significant prognostic indicator in ESCC patients undergoing nICT, demonstrating prognostic outcomes comparable to those of pCR. These findings indicated that MPR could function as a surrogate endpoint for pCR, potentially influencing treatment strategies by refining follow-up protocol and the implementation of adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaImmunotherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeadjuvant therapymajor pathological responseneoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapypathological complete responserecurrence pattern

Identifiers

PMID40692781
PMCPMC12277351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.