ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache or neck and shoulder pain using posture-based deep learning models: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07554664 (Central Sensitization, Work-Related Stress, and Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Desk-Based Workers With and Without Migraine), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Central Sensitization, Work-Related Stress, and Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Desk-Based Workers With and Without Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Central sensitization, work-related stress, and musculoskeletal pain symptoms in desk-based workers with and without migraine: a cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate deep learning models for classifying office workers with and without cervicogenic headache (CH) and/or neck and shoulder pain (NSP), based on habitual sitting posture images. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study analyzed 904 digital images of habitual sitting postures of 531 office workers. Three deep learning models (VGG19, ResNet50, and EfficientNet B5) were trained and evaluated to classify the CH, NSP, and combined CH + NSP. Model performance was assessed using 4-fold cross-validation with metrics including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), and F1 score. Statistical significance was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals. Class Activation Mapping (CAM) was used to visualize the model focus areas. Results: Among 531 office workers (135 with CH, 365 with NSP, 108 with both conditions and 139 control group), ResNet50 achieved the highest performance for CH classification with an AUC of 0.782 (95% CI: 0.770-0.793) and an accuracy of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.731-0.768). NSP classification showed more modest results, with ResNet50 achieving an accuracy of 0.677 (95% CI: 0.640-0.713). In the combined CH + NSP classification, EfficientNet B5 demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.744 (95% CI: 0.647-0.841). CAM analysis revealed distinct focus areas for each condition: the cervical region for CH, the lower body for NSP, and broader neck and trunk regions for combined CH + NSP. Conclusion: Deep learning models show potential for classifying CH and NSP based on habitual sitting posture images, with varying performances across conditions. The ability of these models to detect subtle postural patterns associated with different musculoskeletal conditions suggests their possible applications for early detection and intervention. However, the complex relationship between static posture and musculoskeletal pain underscores the need for a multimodal assessment approach in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.