ReviewScandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology2025
Struggling to be heard: A scoping review of user participation in ADHD mental healthcare for children and adolescents.
Review in Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Growing emphasis is placed on supporting children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in participating in their own healthcare; however, more knowledge is needed to guide practice. Objective: To review the scientific literature on user participation and opportunities for shared decision-making involving younger people referred for ADHD in mental healthcare services, to provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research. Method: A systematic scoping review was performed. Eligibility was determined in two steps by two and three independent researchers, respectively. Data were extracted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings were synthesized across the various contexts and participation groups represented in the included studies. In all, the analysis involved three phases: preparation, organization, and reporting. Results: Of the thirty full-text papers identified, five met the inclusion criteria. Four categories and seven subcategories related to user participation and opportunities for shared decision-making involving children and adolescents with ADHD were identified. The four categories were: (1) sidelined from the start, (2) lack of information, (3) trapped in medication, and (4) growing into active decision-makers; these indicate that children with ADHD feel excluded from the diagnostic process, may have limited treatment choices, and may not be heard. This review also discovers a bias in the existing literature on user participation, with a tendency to emphasize caregivers' or clinicians' perspectives over those of the young people. Conclusions: Young people with ADHD experience they have limited opportunities to participate in their mental healthcare services. User participation and shared decision-making by young people with ADHD should be promoted in clinical practice. Accordingly, future research should explore ways to implement user participation among young people themselves when assessing and treating ADHD, not only among clinicians and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.