ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Ethical dilemmas and the reconstruction of subjectivity in digital mourning in the age of AI: an empirical study on the acceptance intentions of bereaved family members of cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptance and self-reported continued use of AI virtual avatars: an extended UTAUT model with the moderating role of use frequency.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- 'She lifted me up': kinship construction in human-AI resilient communication among Chinese users.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- From technological closed-loop to human-machine trust: a systematic review of ethical and communication challenges of brain-computer interface in elderly care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Non-death loss and GenAI: ethical reflections on griefbots of the living.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Behavioral drivers of AI nursing acceptance in the Greater Bay Area: a family-caregiver perspective on trust and risk.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the rapid advancement of AI replication, virtual memorials, and affective computing technologies, digital mourning has emerged as a prevalent mode of psychological reconstruction for families coping with the loss of terminally ill patients. For family members of cancer patients, who often shoulder prolonged caregiving and complex ethical decisions, this process entails not only emotional trauma but also profound ethical dilemmas. Methods: This study adopts the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as its analytical framework, further integrating Foucauldian subjectivation theory and emotional-cognitive models. A structural path model was constructed to examine how ethical identification and grief perception influence the acceptance of AI-based digital mourning technologies. A total of 129 valid survey responses were collected and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results: The findings indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and ethical concern significantly predict users' intention to adopt digital mourning technologies. Additionally, grief perception not only influences adoption intention but also directly affects actual usage behavior. Discussion: This study highlights that the acceptance of AI-based digital mourning technologies extends beyond instrumental rationality. It is shaped by the interplay of emotional vulnerability and moral tension. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the ethical and psychological dimensions of posthumous AI applications and provide valuable insights for future human-AI interaction design, digital commemoration systems, and the governance of end-of-life technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.