ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
"We're all learning together": exploring peer educator engagement in Recovery Colleges through a participatory research approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery colleges in youth mental health systems: developmentally adapted recovery-oriented learning environments.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Review
- Cultural Adaptation and Implementation Strategy of a Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Training Intervention (REFOCUS-THAIREC) for Healthcare Workers in Thailand: An Experience-Based Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Towards sustainable funding for Recovery Colleges: lessons from Germany for advancing recovery-oriented psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and purpose: Recovery Colleges offer a community-based, recovery-oriented approach that promotes mental health and personal growth through co-produced, peer-led courses. Despite their growth in Canada, limited research examines factors influencing peer educators' sustained engagement-an essential aspect of program sustainability. This study addresses this gap by identifying key factors and developing best practices to support peer educators in Recovery Colleges and enhance retention and well-being. Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach, engaging peer educators as co-researchers. A Committee of seven local peer educators (five remained actively involved) co-designed tools and interpreted findings as the advisory peer educators. All Canadian Recovery Colleges were invited to participate. Data were collected from peer educators and program organizers via an online survey and virtual interviews (n=32, across nine provinces). Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis, with coding refined through an iterative process. Results: We identified five themes for sustaining peer educator engagement: Inclusivity, Connectedness, Adaptability, Empowerment, and Implementation Factors. Practical recommendations emerged for recruitment, training, and workplace support. The findings emphasize the need for inclusive, adaptable, and empowering environments to sustain peer educator engagement in Recovery Colleges. Discussion: Centring peer educator experiences is critical to upholding Recovery Colleges' values and creating inclusive, meaningful learning environments that promote personal and community growth. The participatory nature of the research highlighted the unique insights of our advisory peer educators and echoed the Recovery College principles of promoting recovery and building on individual strengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.