ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Social-ecological factors associated with loneliness in university students: results from the German cross-sectional StudiBiFra study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Loneliness and Academic Stress: The Mediating Role of Lack of Academic Organization Among Social Work Students in Chile.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychosocial burden of discrimination based on sexual orientation in university students-A cross-sectional analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Chain mediation of subjective assessment of insomnia and physical health in the relationship between loneliness and life satisfaction in undergraduate students: a biopsychosocial model of well-being.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Using a social-ecological perspective, this study aims to understand loneliness in university students by (1) assessing its prevalence, and (2) identifying inter-personal and organizational factors associated with loneliness during studies. Methods: Data from the StudiBiFra study, a cross-sectional survey among university students in Germany, were used. The sample consisted of 12,874 students from 7 universities, surveyed between May 2022 and March 2023 using the Bielefeld Questionnaire on Study Conditions and Mental Health. Hierarchical logistic regression was employed to examine the associations of individual, inter-personal, and organizational variables with loneliness. Results: A total of 28.2% of students experienced loneliness during their studies. Gender-diverse students (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.04 - 2.73) and males (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.26 - 1.63), as well as those with poor subjective overall health (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 2.26 - 3.05), were at high risk of feeling lonely. At the inter-personal level, positive social relationships among students acted as a protective factor against loneliness (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.34). At the organizational level, weak connectedness to the university was positively associated with loneliness (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.23 - 1.67), while high university engagement was negatively associated with loneliness (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83 - 0.97). Students enrolled in universities of applied sciences were less likely to experience loneliness compared to those at universities (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63 - 0.91). Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of both individual and institutional efforts to address loneliness at German universities, a demand that was accelerated during and after the pandemic. Promoting social connections and strengthening students' ties to their university are important strategies for combating loneliness, highlighting the importance of community-building health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.