Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692624›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental systems research2025

Evolution from the physical process-based approaches to machine learning approaches to predicting urban floods: a literature review.

Md Shike Bin Mazid Anik, Chunjiang An, S Samuel Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental systems research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Shike Bin Mazid AnikDepartment of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8 Canada.
Chunjiang AnDepartment of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8 Canada.
S Samuel LiDepartment of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban flooding has become a growing concern for many cities due to accelerating urbanisation, changing weather, and drainage system aging. Earlier studies of floods have taken primarily the traditional process-based approach to predicting urban floods, offering limited exploration of recent advancements in AI-driven, real-time, and community-integrated approach, which this paper brings into focus. This paper reviews how flood prediction has improved over the last two decades. It begins by reviewing physical process-based models (PPBMs), which often could not handle the fast changes in cities. New tools like geographic information systems (GIS), light detection and ranging (LiDAR), and satellite images helped improve flood mapping and planning. A big shift came with the use of AI and machine learning. They have made predictions faster, smarter, and more accurately. They allow many types of data, like weather information, sensor data, and social media (crowdsourcing) data. Recently, new tools like Internet of Things devices, deep learning, and hybrid models have brought even more progress. However, there are still challenges. Many cities still do not have the data, sensors, or systems needed to use these tools. Many models work on their own, not linked with city planning or community efforts. Flood solutions must now be more than just technical. Future systems should combine AI, hydrodynamics, GIS, and real-time monitoring, adapt to city change, and include input from communities. Open-source tools, public education, and better planning are also needed to make cities safer and more resilient to costly floods.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceGISGreen infrastructureMachine learningRemote sensingUrban floodingUrban resilience

Identifiers

PMID40692624
PMCPMC12276141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.