Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Preoperative remote consultation for a green bariatric surgery: can telemedicine be safe for patients and sustainable for the environment?

Luigi Eduardo Conte, Michela Orsi, Alessandro Peruzzi, Chiara Fantozzi, Michela Campanelli, Domenico Benavoli, Bruno Sensi, Paolo Gentileschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luigi Eduardo ConteDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Michela OrsiDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro PeruzziTechnical Department, Province of Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy.
Chiara FantozziDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Michela CampanelliDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.
Domenico BenavoliDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy.
Bruno SensiDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Paolo GentileschiDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing emphasis on sustainability and digitalization has brought telemedicine to the forefront, particularly in bariatric surgery. This study evaluates the safety, clinical effectiveness and environmental impact of telemedicine for patients with obesity eligible for bariatric surgery. Materials and methods: A total of 338 patients underwent remote consultations via Zoom in 2023. Median age was 38 years (±4); 70% of patients were female. Mean BMI before surgery was 43 kg/m Results: Remote consultations reduced total travel emissions from 50,766.01 kg to 17.73 kg CO Conclusion: Telemedicine in bariatric surgery is safe, effective, and significantly reduces environmental impact. Remote consultations did not alter clinical decisions or outcomes. Wider adoption could benefit from dedicated digital tools to enhance patient care and sustainability.

Indexed as

bariatric surgeryenvironmentgreen surgeryobesitysurgerytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40692588
PMCPMC12277319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.