Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692578›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

An international questionnaire highlights and supports the case for including girls in Creatine Transporter Deficiency research.

Carole Chehowah, Audrey Mittelman, Vincent des Portes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carole ChehowahAssociation Xtraordinaire, Paris, France.
Audrey MittelmanDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Bron, France.
Vincent des PortesDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Bron, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, significant progress has been made for Creatine Transporter Deficiency (CTD) patients, with increased awareness and visibility, better diagnosis, and improved care. Research projects have paved the way for clinical trials on the horizon. However, girls with CTD have been overlooked. Because they are considered a negligible cohort with less serious symptoms compared to males, girls with rare X-linked disorders have never been a priority for diagnosis and research. This results in underdiagnosis, systematic exclusion from clinical studies, and a considerable impact on the development of female patients. As a patient association, Xtraordinaire aims to counter these beliefs and to show that females deserve as much attention as males. Our first initiative identified girls with CTD within our community and led to the development of an international questionnaire to collect more specific data in this population. Of the 22 families who completed the questionnaire, the delay between symptom onset (mean age 1.8 years) and diagnosis (mean age 11.8 years) highlighted the difficulty of diagnosis for girls, often given several wavering diagnoses before reaching a CTD diagnosis. Almost half of families (47%) had difficulties securing a specialist appointment. Our questionnaire emphasized that girls with CTD have identical symptoms to males and similar delays in development milestones. These data have generated interest, and researchers have started to include girls in their studies. We strongly believe that upcoming studies on females will enrich our knowledge, further our understanding of CTD, help better diagnose girls, and develop adapted treatments.

Indexed as

Creatine Transporter Deficiencygender disparitygirls with CTDpatient advocacy organizationSLC6A8X-linked

Identifiers

PMID40692578
PMCPMC12277310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.