ArticleCognitive science2025
Computational Sentence-Level Metrics of Reading Speed and Its Ramifications for Sentence Comprehension.
Article in Cognitive science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The majority of research in computational psycholinguistics on sentence processing has focused on word-by-word incremental processing within sentences, rather than holistic sentence-level representations. This study introduces two novel computational approaches for quantifying sentence-level processing: sentence surprisal and sentence relevance. Using multilingual large language models (LLMs), we compute sentence surprisal through three methods, chain rule, next sentence prediction, and negative log-likelihood, and apply a "memory-aware" approach to calculate sentence-level semantic relevance based on convolution operations. The sentence-level metrics developed are tested and compared to validate whether they can predict the reading speed of sentences, and, further, we explore how sentence-level metrics take effects on human processing and comprehending sentences as a whole across languages. The results show that sentence-level metrics are highly capable of predicting sentence reading speed. Our results also indicate that these computational sentence-level metrics are exceptionally effective at predicting and explaining the processing difficulties encountered by readers in processing sentences as a whole across a variety of languages. The proposed sentence-level metrics offer significant interpretability and achieve high accuracy in predicting human sentence reading speed, as they capture unique aspects of comprehension difficulty beyond word-level measures. These metrics serve as valuable computational tools for investigating human sentence processing and advancing our understanding of naturalistic reading. Their strong performance and generalization capabilities highlight their potential to drive progress at the intersection of LLMs and cognitive science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.