Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692278›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Implementing Transitional Care Interventions for Surgical Patients: A Scoping Review.

G Tobiano, B M Gillespie, K Turner, A M Eskes, B Patel, J Colquhoun, L Ferronato, W Chaboyer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G TobianoNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-0777
B M GillespieNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-5691
K TurnerGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
A M EskesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
B PatelGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
J ColquhounGriffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
L FerronatoGold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
W ChaboyerNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1196436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo synthesise the evidence on implementation strategies used to implement transitional care interventions for adult surgical patients.

designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched in August 2023 and updated June 2025, followed by citation searches. Studies were screened independently by two researchers, and one extracted data, another verified its accuracy. Studies about transitional care interventions for adult surgical patients were coded according to the 'Five classes of implementation strategies' and the 'Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations' framework, to illuminate the review findings.

resultsBased on 27 studies included in the scoping review, staff education, changes to staffing and electronic systems, and change management techniques were frequently used implementation strategies. Implementation strategies were mostly used with patients undergoing colorectal and cardiac surgery in Asia and the United States. Scale-up strategies and capacity-building initiatives for people in charge of spearheading the change initiatives were less common.

conclusionsTo further the field, future research could focus on capacity-building and scale-up strategies, fidelity reporting, and financial implications of implementation in a wider range of surgical populations and settings. Work is needed to effectively implement surgical transitional care interventions in real-world settings. IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Our findings provide strategies for hospital leaders to adopt when implementing transitional care interventions for surgical patients. REPORTING

methodScoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Determined review focus, interpreted findings, and contributed to manuscript. REVIEW REGISTRATION: The Open Science Framework.

Indexed as

Surgical Procedures, OperativeTransitional CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcontinuity of patient carehospital to home transitioninpatientsnursesoperativepatient dischargepostoperative carereviewsurgical procedurestransitional care

Identifiers

PMID40692278
PMCPMC12994648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.