ArticleJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2025
Endoscopy and noninvasive tests in pediatric disorders of gut-brain interaction: A multicenter retrospective study of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.
Article in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endoscopy and noninvasive tests in pediatric disorders of gut-brain interaction: A multicenter retrospective study of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDisorders of gut-brain interactions (DGBIs) are highly prevalent in pediatric gastroenterology and often lead to the use of invasive and noninvasive diagnostic tests, despite the guidance provided by the Rome IV criteria. Rome IV promotes a positive diagnostic approach based on the identification of specific symptoms occurring at defined frequencies, unexplained after thorough medical evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and diagnostic accuracy of these tests in pediatric DGBIs.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (aged 2-16 years) evaluated for suspected DGBIs, as defined by the Rome IV criteria, across five national pediatric gastroenterology centers. Patients with known underlying organic gastrointestinal diseases were excluded. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of "red flags" for organic pathology, including a positive family history for gastrointestinal diseases, persistent pain outside the periumbilical area, nocturnal symptoms, persistent, bilious, or bloody vomiting; presence of blood in stools or anemia; unexplained fever; altered growth parameters, delayed or abnormal puberty; associated gastrointestinal or extraintestinal symptoms; and abnormal physical findings. Clinical data, final diagnoses, and all performed tests were recorded. Statistical analysis assessed the frequency and diagnostic accuracy of each test, and a multivariate model developed to improve diagnostic accuracy.
resultsWe included 500 patients with suspected DGBIs from five centers: 52.5% were female, and the median age was 9.1 ± 4.5 years. Red flags were present in 45% of patients, showing a higher frequency of positive family history, elevated inflammatory serological markers, and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels. Patients with red flag underwent more endoscopies; however, no significant increase in the detection of organic disease was observed. No single test alone demonstrated sufficient accuracy in predicting organic pathology. A multivariate model combining the presence of red flags, positive family history, elevated serum platelet count, and increased FC achieved the highest accuracy (area under the curve: 0.711, 95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.79).
conclusionsA model combining red flags for organic disease, positive family history, elevated serum platelet count, and increased FC may aid in the identification of organic diseases in children with suspected DGBIs. Prospective studies are needed to validate this model and to support the diagnostic process when Rome IV criteria alone do not distinguish between organic and functional disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.