ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Evaluation of Deep Learning Methods for Pulmonary Disease Classification.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- SpecAtt-Net: Time-Frequency-Based Image Representations of Slice-Level Radiomic Features for Explainable Lung Cancer Classification via Slice-Wise Activation Mapping.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable Multi-Modal Deep Learning for Recording-Level Classification of Respiratory Audio Signals Under Internal and Domain-Shift Evaluation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Respiratory sound-based AI screening of asthma and COPD via multi-feature fusion and CatBoost classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDriven by environmental pollution and the rise in infectious diseases, the increasing prevalence of lung conditions demands advancements in diagnostic techniques. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study explores the use of various features, such as spectrograms, chromograms, and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), to extract crucial information from auscultation recordings. It addresses challenges through filter-based audio enhancement methods. The primary goal is to improve disease detection accuracy by leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for feature extraction and dense neural networks for classification.
resultsWhile deep learning models like CNNs and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) outperform traditional machine learning models such as Sequence Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and random forest with accuracies ranging from 70% to 85%. The combination of CNN, RNN, and long short-term memory achieved an accuracy of 88%. By integrating MFCC, Chroma Short-Term Fourier Transform (STFT), and spectrogram features with a CNN-based classifier, the proposed multi-feature deep learning model achieved the highest accuracy of 92%, surpassing all other methods. DISCUSSION: The study effectively addresses key issues, including the overrepresentation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) samples over Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI) and Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTI) which hampers generalization across test audio samples.
conclusionThe proposed methodology caters common challenges like background noise in recordings, and the limited and imbalanced nature of datasets. These findings pave the way for enhanced clinical applications, showcasing the transformative potential of multi-feature deep learning methods in the classification of pulmonary diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.