Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692157›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025

Evaluation of Deep Learning Methods for Pulmonary Disease Classification.

Ajay Pal Singh, Ankita Nigam, Gaurav Garg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ajay Pal SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mahakaushal University, Jabalpur-482003, India.
Ankita NigamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mahakaushal University, Jabalpur-482003, India.
Gaurav GargDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDriven by environmental pollution and the rise in infectious diseases, the increasing prevalence of lung conditions demands advancements in diagnostic techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study explores the use of various features, such as spectrograms, chromograms, and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), to extract crucial information from auscultation recordings. It addresses challenges through filter-based audio enhancement methods. The primary goal is to improve disease detection accuracy by leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for feature extraction and dense neural networks for classification.

resultsWhile deep learning models like CNNs and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) outperform traditional machine learning models such as Sequence Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and random forest with accuracies ranging from 70% to 85%. The combination of CNN, RNN, and long short-term memory achieved an accuracy of 88%. By integrating MFCC, Chroma Short-Term Fourier Transform (STFT), and spectrogram features with a CNN-based classifier, the proposed multi-feature deep learning model achieved the highest accuracy of 92%, surpassing all other methods. DISCUSSION: The study effectively addresses key issues, including the overrepresentation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) samples over Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (LRTI) and Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTI) which hampers generalization across test audio samples.

conclusionThe proposed methodology caters common challenges like background noise in recordings, and the limited and imbalanced nature of datasets. These findings pave the way for enhanced clinical applications, showcasing the transformative potential of multi-feature deep learning methods in the classification of pulmonary diseases.

Indexed as

AuscultationDeep LearningLung DiseasesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRespiratory SoundsChromagramCNNDeep LearningMFCCPulmonary DiseasesSpectrogram.

Identifiers

PMID40692157
PMCPMC12813545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.