Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40692124›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2025

Mixed Evidence for Species Diversity Affecting Ecological Forecasts in Constant Versus Declining Light.

Romana Limberger, Uriah Daugaard, Yves Choffat, Anubhav Gupta, Martina Jelić, Sabina Jyrkinen, Rainer M Krug, Seraina Nohl, Frank Pennekamp, Sofia J van Moorsel and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Romana LimbergerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9421-7520
Uriah DaugaardDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4092-717X
Yves ChoffatDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anubhav GuptaDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7977-9747
Martina JelićDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sabina JyrkinenDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rainer M KrugDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7490-0066
Seraina NohlDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frank PennekampDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0679-1045
Sofia J van MoorselDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-8971
Xue ZhengDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Debra Zuppinger-DingleyDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4573-0563
Owen L PetcheyDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-1633

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_188431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate forecasts of ecological dynamics are critical for ecosystem management and conservation, yet the drivers of forecastability are poorly understood. Environmental change and diversity are considered major challenges to ecological forecasting. This assumption, however, has never been tested experimentally because forecasts have high data requirements. In a long-term microcosm experiment, we manipulated the species richness of 30 experimental protist communities and exposed them to constant or gradually decreasing light levels. We collected finely resolved time series (123 sampling dates over 41 weeks) of species abundances, community biomass, and oxygen concentrations. We then employed data-driven forecasting methods to forecast these variables. We found that species richness and light had a weak interactive effect on forecasts of species abundances: richness tended to reduce forecast accuracy in constant light but tended to increase forecast accuracy in declining light. These effects could partially be explained by differences among time series in variability and autocorrelation. Forecasts of aggregate properties (community biomass, oxygen), however, were unaffected by richness and light and were not more accurate than those of species abundances. Our forecasts were based on time series that were detrended and standardized. Since real-world forecasting applications require predictions at the original scale of the forecasted variable, it is important to note that the results were qualitatively identical when back-transforming the forecasts to the original scale. Taken together, we found no strong evidence that higher diversity results in lower forecastability. Rather, our results imply that promoting diversity could make populations more predictable when environmental conditions change. From a conservation and management perspective, our findings suggest preliminary support that diversity conservation might have beneficial effects on decision-taking by increasing the forecastability of species abundances in changing environments.

Indexed as

BiodiversityLightBiomassEcosystemForecastingOxygenOxygencomplexityecological forecastingempirical dynamic modeling (EDM)environmental changemachine learningmicrocosm experimentmicroorganismspredictability

Identifiers

PMID40692124
PMCPMC12280262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.