Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691897›Full record

ArticleBiomedical journal2026

Discrepant treponemal test results: Identification of associated risk factors through machine learning technology in 18-year electronic medical records and national claims data.

Hsin-Yao Wang, Ru-Fang Hu, Ting-Wei Lin, Wan-Ying Lin, Yu-Chiang Wang, Jang-Jih Lu, Yi-Ju Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Odyssey of macrophages.Biomedical journal · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hsin-Yao WangSchool of Medicine, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ru-Fang HuDepartment of Information Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ting-Wei LinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wan-Ying LinDepartment of Medicine, University at Buffalo-Catholic Health System, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Yu-Chiang WangJohn A Burn School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, HI, USA; Department of Cardiology, Queens Medical Center, HI, USA.
Jang-Jih LuDivision of Clinical Pathology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yi-Ju TsengDepartment of Computer Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: yjtseng@nycu.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSyphilis is a prevalent disease diagnosed primarily through serological tests. Although one confirmatory treponemal tests (TT), including Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) or fluorescent treponema antibody absorption (FTA-Abs), is required for syphilis diagnosis, multiple TTs are commonly administered throughout the disease course. Discrepant TT results can cause confusion and delay treatment. In this study, we identified the clinical characteristics of patients with discrepant TT results and developed a machine learning tool to evaluate the risk of TT discrepancies. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records were linked to national claims records collected from 2001 to 2018. Variables of interest in risk factor identification and machine learning model development included medical histories and demographic characteristics. The association between syphilis treatment and discrepant TT results was further assessed.

resultsAmong 5780 eligible patients tested for syphilis, 133 (2.30 %) had discrepant TT results. HIV and AIDS were identified as prominent risk factors associated with discrepant TT results (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6, 95 % confidence interval = 1.4-4.7). Patients with a top 5 % risk probability in the LightGBM model were 10 times more likely than others to have discrepant TT results. TPPA was more likely than FTA-Abs to become negative after treatment among patients with discrepant TT results (odds ratio = 14.7, 95 % confidence interval = 1.9-115.4).

conclusionsRisk factor identification and machine learning model development can support the interpretation of serological tests for syphilis, enabling accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningSyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultDiscrepant resultsRisk factorSerologic testSyphilisTreponemal test

Identifiers

PMID40691897
PMCPMC13091108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.