ArticleBiomedical journal2026
Discrepant treponemal test results: Identification of associated risk factors through machine learning technology in 18-year electronic medical records and national claims data.
Article in Biomedical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Odyssey of macrophages.Biomedical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSyphilis is a prevalent disease diagnosed primarily through serological tests. Although one confirmatory treponemal tests (TT), including Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) or fluorescent treponema antibody absorption (FTA-Abs), is required for syphilis diagnosis, multiple TTs are commonly administered throughout the disease course. Discrepant TT results can cause confusion and delay treatment. In this study, we identified the clinical characteristics of patients with discrepant TT results and developed a machine learning tool to evaluate the risk of TT discrepancies. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records were linked to national claims records collected from 2001 to 2018. Variables of interest in risk factor identification and machine learning model development included medical histories and demographic characteristics. The association between syphilis treatment and discrepant TT results was further assessed.
resultsAmong 5780 eligible patients tested for syphilis, 133 (2.30 %) had discrepant TT results. HIV and AIDS were identified as prominent risk factors associated with discrepant TT results (adjusted odds ratio = 2.6, 95 % confidence interval = 1.4-4.7). Patients with a top 5 % risk probability in the LightGBM model were 10 times more likely than others to have discrepant TT results. TPPA was more likely than FTA-Abs to become negative after treatment among patients with discrepant TT results (odds ratio = 14.7, 95 % confidence interval = 1.9-115.4).
conclusionsRisk factor identification and machine learning model development can support the interpretation of serological tests for syphilis, enabling accurate diagnosis and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.