ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Root morphology and anatomy respond similarly to drought and flooding in two wheat cultivars.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wheat Drought Management: A Broader Prospect.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Root anatomical gradients and cultivar differences underlie variation in root hydraulic properties in German winter wheat.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsWheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is widely grown in regions prone to both drought and flooding conditions. Although root responses to drought and flooding have been extensively studied separately, studies comparing key anatomical root traits in wheat in both conditions side-by-side are rare. We tested the hypothesis that wheat roots respond in a similar manner to both drought and flooding, despite these being contrasting water regimes.
methodsTwo wheat cultivars ('Jackson' and 'Frument') were grown hydroponically in control conditions, drought and flooding, and the responses in plant growth, root morphology, root anatomy, development of apoplastic barriers and their capacity to reduce radial water loss were measured. KEY
resultsXylem-to-stele ratio decreased by 33% under water stress compared with control conditions, whereas aerenchyma-to-cortex ratio increased 2.1-fold during both drought and flooding compared with control conditions. Compared with control conditions, lateral root growth was more reduced than adventitious root growth, 86% and 67%, respectively, under both types of water stress. There was comparably stunted root and shoot growth under water stress, and adventitious roots grew slower likewise and to one-third of length compared with control conditions. Our findings did not indicate differences in soil flooding tolerances between the two cultivars.
conclusionsWe conclude that different underlying physical processes during contrasting water regimes, e.g., water limitation during drought and oxygen deficiency during flooding, result in similar root responses, e.g., increased relative aerenchyma area, lignin and suberin deposition in the endodermis, and decreased lateral-to-adventitious root length. Future research should provide a more comprehensive understanding of cross-stress effects on root morphology, anatomy and physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.