Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691836›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2025

Root morphology and anatomy respond similarly to drought and flooding in two wheat cultivars.

Tobias Guhr, Zhiwei Song, Albert G Andersen, Juan de la Cruz Jiménez, Ole Pedersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wheat Drought Management: A Broader Prospect.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias GuhrDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-7696-4792
Zhiwei SongDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Albert G AndersenDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Juan de la Cruz JiménezDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Ole PedersenDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 3rd floor, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-946X

Funding

Danida 19-03-KUDanida 25-07-KUErasmus+ 2023-1-DE01-KAg131-HED-0001136095the European Union
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsWheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is widely grown in regions prone to both drought and flooding conditions. Although root responses to drought and flooding have been extensively studied separately, studies comparing key anatomical root traits in wheat in both conditions side-by-side are rare. We tested the hypothesis that wheat roots respond in a similar manner to both drought and flooding, despite these being contrasting water regimes.

methodsTwo wheat cultivars ('Jackson' and 'Frument') were grown hydroponically in control conditions, drought and flooding, and the responses in plant growth, root morphology, root anatomy, development of apoplastic barriers and their capacity to reduce radial water loss were measured. KEY

resultsXylem-to-stele ratio decreased by 33% under water stress compared with control conditions, whereas aerenchyma-to-cortex ratio increased 2.1-fold during both drought and flooding compared with control conditions. Compared with control conditions, lateral root growth was more reduced than adventitious root growth, 86% and 67%, respectively, under both types of water stress. There was comparably stunted root and shoot growth under water stress, and adventitious roots grew slower likewise and to one-third of length compared with control conditions. Our findings did not indicate differences in soil flooding tolerances between the two cultivars.

conclusionsWe conclude that different underlying physical processes during contrasting water regimes, e.g., water limitation during drought and oxygen deficiency during flooding, result in similar root responses, e.g., increased relative aerenchyma area, lignin and suberin deposition in the endodermis, and decreased lateral-to-adventitious root length. Future research should provide a more comprehensive understanding of cross-stress effects on root morphology, anatomy and physiology.

Indexed as

DroughtsFloodsPlant RootsTriticumPlant ShootsStress, PhysiologicalWaterXylemWaterAerenchymadroughtfloodingporosityradial water lossroot morphologyTriticum aestivum L

Identifiers

PMID40691836
PMCPMC12682829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.