Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691807›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases of poverty2025

Mass drug administration trials of azithromycin: an analysis to inform future research and guidelines.

Alex C Kong, Anthony D So

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex C KongDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. alex.cy.kong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5771-2757
Anthony D SoDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Greenwall Foundation Making a Difference Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2020, the World Health Organization published a guideline on the use of mass drug administration (MDA) of the broad-spectrum antibiotic azithromycin to reduce childhood mortality. As MDA-azithromycin to reduce mortality is considered for expansion to more settings and populations, care must be taken to maximize benefits and reduce risks (e.g., antimicrobial resistance or AMR) of this intervention. Completed and ongoing MDA-azithromycin cluster-randomized clinical trials can provide evidence on the extent to which these benefits and risks accrue and identify practices to monitor these effects and address evidence gaps in future trials.

methodsWe examined azithromycin clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from registry inception to December 31, 2023. We included trials for which azithromycin was administered for the prevention or treatment of a disease or condition that was not explicitly diagnosed or necessary for participant inclusion, and for which treatment was randomized by geographic units. We identified evidence, knowledge gaps, and trends and highlights across five domains: (1) targeting of MDA-azithromycin, (2) clinical endpoints, (3) co- and competing interventions, (4) spillover effects, and (5) AMR monitoring.

resultsOf 1589 screened studies, 30 met all inclusion criteria. These trials were conducted in 13 countries, predominantly (26/30) in sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly a third (9/30) of the trials included mortality endpoints, but few (2/9) included cause-specific mortality endpoints. New evidence suggests the benefits of widening the target age group and the persistence of mortality benefits in settings with competing interventions. Published practices to ensure geographic separation of communities in different treatment arms to reduce spillover effects were not customary. We found information on AMR monitoring practices for just over half the trials (16/30). Of these, half (8/16) included both phenotypic and genotypic AMR testing, and more than half collected specimens to assess the nasopharyngeal and gut microbiomes (9/16) and tested for non-macrolide resistance (11/16).

conclusionsFurther long-term MDA-azithromycin studies to determine which additional countries could benefit, interventions to accompany or replace this intervention, and the extent to which AMR spillover occurs may prove valuable as guidelines are revised.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinMass Drug AdministrationClinical Trials as TopicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinAntimicrobial resistanceAzithromycinClinical trial designMass drug administration

Identifiers

PMID40691807
PMCPMC12278655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.