ArticleBMC medicine2025
Development and recalibration of a multivariable type 1 diabetes prediction model for type 1 diabetes across multiple screening studies.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- C-Peptide Provides Critical Contextual Insight Into Elevated Glucose Values During Progression to Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- International consensus guidance for general population screening for islet autoantibodies to diagnose early-stage type 1 diabetes: a nominal group technique process.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Development and application of type 1 diabetes polygenic scores across diverse populations.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Islet autoantibodies as predictors of type 1 diabetes development, a systematic review with public health implications for Africa.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Review
- Correction: Development and recalibration of a multivariable type 1 diabetes prediction model for type 1 diabetes across multiple screening studies.BMC medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate type 1 diabetes prediction is important to facilitate screening for pre-clinical type 1 diabetes to enable potential early disease-modifying interventions and to reduce the risk of severe presentation with diabetic ketoacidosis. We aimed to assess the generalisability of a prediction model developed in children followed from birth. Additionally, we sought to create an application for easy calculation and visualisation of individualised risk prediction.
methodsWe developed and internally validated a stratified prediction model combining a genetic risk score, age, islet autoantibodies, and family history using data from children followed since birth by The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study. We tested the validity of the model through external validation in the Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Pathway to Prevention study, which conducts cross-sectional screening in relatives of people with type 1 diabetes. We recalibrated the model by adjusting for baseline risk and selection criteria in TrialNet using logistic recalibration to improve calibration across all ages.
resultsThe study included 7798 TEDDY and 4068 TrialNet participants, with 305 (4%) and 1373 (34%) developing type 1 diabetes, respectively. The stratified model showed similar discriminative ability in autoantibody-positive participants across TEDDY and TrialNet, but inferior calibration in TrialNet (Brier score 0.40 [95% CI 0.38,0.43]). Adjustment for baseline risk and selection criteria in TrialNet using logistic recalibration improved calibration across all ages (Brier score 0.16 [0.14,0.17]; p < 0.001). A web calculator was developed to visualise individual risk estimates ( https://t1dpredictor.diabetesgenes.org ).
conclusionsA stratified model incorporating the type 1 diabetes genetic risk score, family history, age, and autoantibody status can predict type 1 diabetes risk with improved accuracy, but may need recalibration depending on the screening strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.