ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025
Could serum IGF-1 and IGF-2 serve as potential biomarkers in idiopathic Parkinson's disease? A correlation with disease stages.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIdiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by tremor, rigidity, akinesia, and postural instability. Dysfunction in lysosomal autophagy, involving proteins like IGF-1(insulin like growth factor) and IGF-2, contributes to neuroinflammation and neuronal death. Reliable biomarkers for IPD diagnosis and monitoring remain elusive. This study investigates serum IGF-1 and IGF-2 levels to evaluate their biomarker potential.
methodsEighty-four individuals (43 IPD patients, 41 controls) aged 18-79 were included. Diagnoses followed the UK Brain Bank Criteria; disease severity was assessed with Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) and UPDRS scales. Serum IGF-1 and IGF-2 levels were measured using ELISA. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v30.0. Normality was assessed via the Shapiro-Wilk test. Based on data distribution, Independent Samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman correlation, and ROC analysis were applied. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsSerum IGF-2 levels were significantly higher in patients compared to controls (p = 0.006), while IGF-1 levels showed no significant difference. Both IGF-1 and IGF-2 levels displayed negatively correlated with disease duration (p = 0.044 and p = 0.008). Although IGF-1 and IGF-2 levels appeared elevated at H&Y stage 2, the differences were not statistically significant. No significant associations were observed between IGF levels and UPDRS scores or medication use.
conclusionElevated serum IGF-2 levels indicate its potential as a biomarker for IPD. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the role of IGF-1 and IGF-2 in IPD pathophysiology, suggesting that further multicenter studies are needed to clarify their diagnostic and therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40691745What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.