ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Association Between Racial Equity Plans and Political and Sociodemographic Factors in US Cities.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Racial equity is the state at which a person's race does not determine how they are treated, or their opportunities, resources, or outcomes. It entails the continuous process of identifying and removing policies, practices, and structures that create and sustain racial disparities. Some local governments that had not previously developed equity programs pledged to address racial inequity during the pandemic in response to COVID-19 disparities and calls for racial justice. Understanding cities' approach to addressing inequities is important for measuring progress and developing effective strategies. From May to August 2023, we implemented topic and regression modeling approaches to assess how the 200 largest cities in the USA were planning to implement strategies to address racial inequity. Of the 200 cities, 75 (37.5%) had equity offices, departments, initiatives, or divisions; 19.5% and 9.5% had equity and racial equity plans, respectively. Overall, cities with a combination of a Democratic governor and mayor had the most equity offices or departments (39 cities; 19.50%), followed by Republican governors and Democratic mayors (19 cities; 9.50%), which aligned with previous research on political affiliation of leaders and policy priorities. The geographic region where a city was located also impacted equity plans, though less than one might expect given typical conceptions of the political affiliations in different areas of the country. Highly populated cities were more likely to have a stronger equity emphasis. Cities focused on equity in housing, economic well-being and/or workforce, environment, infrastructure, safety, health, education, civic engagement, and criminal justice and/or policing. While some cities recognized the importance of developing equity plans and offices, their approaches differed. However, to be effective, plans to address racial inequities must be accompanied by implementation and approaches to measure, analyze, and assess progress. Our findings can inform plans and strategies to advance racial equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40691742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.