Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691718›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Application of smart technologies for predicting soil erosion patterns.

Rana Muhammad Adnan Ikram, Mo Wang, Hossein Moayedi, Atefeh Ahmadi Dehrashid, Shiva Gharibi, Jing-Cheng Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rana Muhammad Adnan IkramWaterScience and Environmental Research Centre, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Mo WangSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Hossein MoayediInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Atefeh Ahmadi DehrashidFaculty of Natural Resources, Department of Climatology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Shiva GharibiFaculty of Natural Resources, Department of Environment, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran. Shiva.Gharibi@uok.ac.ir.
Jing-Cheng HanWaterScience and Environmental Research Centre, College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil is a critical natural resource, and accurate erosion susceptibility assessment is vital for the optimal management and development of soil resources. Erosion susceptibility assessment is necessary for long-term conservation plans, but the process can be expensive and time-consuming over large areas. It is imperative to examine the impact of water-induced erosion on cultivated lands, as it can cause significant damage. This study evaluates the effectiveness of four data-driven approaches (biogeography-based optimization, earthworm optimization algorithm, symbiotic organisms search, and whale optimization algorithm) combined with artificial neural network models for the assessment of erosion susceptibility. The examined criteria include 14 geographic and environmental criteria, and the data used in a ratio of 70 to 30 for training and testing operations. And its results were measured by AUC values. The evaluation of AUC accuracy indices revealed compelling results. Specifically, in the case of SOS-MLP, the highest AUC values were observed, reaching 0.9973 for test data and 0.9296 for train data. Conversely, for WOA-MLP, the AUC values obtained were slightly lower but still notable, registering at 0.9809 for test data and 0.959 for train data. These values were also calculated for BBO-MLP (0.999 and 0.9327) and EWA-MLP (0.9304 and 0.9296) in the training and testing phases, respectively. Results showed that all four methods could successfully evaluate erosion susceptibility according to AUC values greater than 0.92, especially the BBO-MLP with the highest AUC values. Therefore, the findings of this study have shown that the combined optimization algorithms and Machine Learning used in this research have a suitable ability to optimize the artificial neural network and are very useful for identifying areas sensitive to erosion.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkErosion susceptibility map (ESM)Optimization algorithmsRisk management

Identifiers

PMID40691718
PMCPMC12279979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.