ArticleScientific reports2025
Extraction and comparison of the interactions of tetracycline antibiotics by different types of cyclodextrins using molecular docking studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A hazard to humanity is people's indiscriminate use of pharmacological compounds, such as antibiotics, and their presence in the environment or water supplies, which are not eliminated during the purification process. Either left in open water, they cause sickness in humans and animals. As a result, antibiotic use management is required. This study aims to extract and assess the interactions between α, β, and γ-cyclodextrins (CD) and Tetracycline antibiotics. Studies show these chemicals have not yet been extracted and compared using various CDs. Thus, the molecular docking computational method was used to study the guest-host interaction of the CD with three types of Tetracycline antibiotics, which was helpful before laboratory investigation to achieve the ability to extract antibiotics by CD and to prevent wasting time and money. Although molecular docking provided valuable insights into the host-guest interactions, no molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted in the present study. Future investigations are recommended to perform MD simulations to assess the stability, flexibility (RMSF), and conformational stability (RMSD) of the CD-antibiotic complexes over time. The optimal orientation and manner of molecule binding for antibiotics in the CD cavity's active site were examined using molecular docking studies. To fully capture the stability and flexibility of the docked complexes over time, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations should be employed as a complementary approach to docking studies. MD simulations allow for the observation of real-time structural fluctuations, solvent effects, and entropy contributions, which are not accounted for in standard docking models. Previous research has demonstrated the significance of MD in refining docking predictions and providing a more accurate assessment of host-guest stability in CD-based systems. Future studies should incorporate MD analyses to validate docking results and further enhance our understanding of tetracycline-CD interactions. As a result, the γ-type was the best for Doxycycline with the highest binding energy of - 8.1, and for Minocycline and Tetracycline with a binding energy of - 7.4 compared to α- and β-CD. Furthermore, the poorest host for the formation of the resultant complex was the α-CD cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.