ArticleTropical medicine and health2025
Ethnobotanical study of traditional antivenom treatments in Burkina Faso.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic characterisation of traditional phytotherapeutic formulations used for snakebite envenomation treatment in Burkina Faso.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025Article
- Ethnobotanical Survey and Documentation of Medicinal Plants Used to Manage Snakebite Envenomation in Nyatike Subcounty, Migori County, Kenya.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSnakebite envenomation constitutes a major public health challenge in Burkina Faso, particularly within rural communities. Limited access to formal healthcare services, coupled with the high cost of antivenom treatment, has led to widespread reliance on traditional health practitioners (THPs). This study was therefore undertaken to generate empirical data on the role of THPs in the management of snakebite envenomation, with a focus on the medicinal plants employed, methods of remedy preparation, and routes of administration.
methodA preliminary survey was conducted to identify traditional health practitioners THPs involved in snakebite envenomation management within the study regions. The preliminary survey involved 799 individuals selected through convenience sampling in local markets. Ethnobotanical data were subsequently gathered from the identified practitioners via semi-structured interviews. The collected data were entered and analysed via an Excel spreadsheet. In addition to the sociodemographic characteristics of THPs, the relative frequency of citation (RFC) were also determined.
resultsThe results revealed that 90% of the THPs were male and that 76.67% illiterate. Over half of the THPs had more than two decades of experience. Diagnosis was mainly based on symptoms, with 60% relying on bite site examination. Most treatments involved plant-based powders (73.33%), typically applied subcutaneously through incisions. Roots were the most commonly used plant part in antivenom preparations (29%), while dried and calcined materials were the predominant form of medicinal plant preparation in the region. The study identified 29 plant species across 18 botanical families. Annona senegalensis Pers., Nauclea latifolia Sm., and Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn had the highest relative frequency of citation (RFC), each at 10%. Encouragingly, 63.33% of THPs had participated in training or awareness sessions with health centres. Additionally, 46.66% referred patients to hospitals when traditional treatments were insufficient.
conclusionThese results highlight the therapeutic potential of local medicinal plants in the treatment of snakebite envenomation and support the need for strengthened collaboration between traditional and biomedical healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.