ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2025
Cross-sectional analysis of online information on low back pain across South African chiropractic websites.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical guide to structuring the Methods and Results sections in clinical and epidemiological studies.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRising low back pain (LBP) prevalence and increased patient reliance on online health resources necessitate critically evaluating how chiropractic websites represent common musculoskeletal conditions. This study analyzed LBP-related content shared by South African chiropractic websites to assess the credibility of available information.
methodsA cross-sectional content evaluation was conducted between 2 June 2024 and 21 July 2024 on 333 South African chiropractic websites, identified using a Google search cross-referenced with the Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa registry. Four key areas were evaluated, including (1) contributors to, (2) diagnostic approaches for, (3) possible treatment approaches for and 4) indicators for seeking professional treatment for LBP. Sociodemographic factors such as educational background, sex, and practice ownership structure were considered. A pilot ensured data collection standardization. Content and statistical analysis explored information, citation frequency and identified trends in chiropractic online health communication.
resultsThe analysis revealed significant variability of LBP-related content across chiropractic websites. Of the 333 websites analyzed, most chiropractors were trained at UJ (58.1%) and DUT (29.2%). Sex distribution showed 55.3% were female-owned. The highest concentration of chiropractic websites was in Gauteng, the Western Cape, and KwaZulu-Natal. Regarding the 4 key areas, mechanical contributors to LBP were predominant (65.2%), diagnostic approaches (56.7%), treatment approaches (79.6%) and explicit guidance on when to seek care (47.4%) was mentioned in the websites. Only 13.5% of websites cite sources of the information shared. Chiropractors trained at UJ and DUT emphasized evidence-based treatments, while those trained internationally referenced alternative methods. Sex differences showed males focusing on diagnostic tools and treatment protocols, while females emphasized holistic care and lifestyle modifications.
conclusionThis study highlights the need for improved LBP information quality and consistency on South African chiropractic websites. The structured subjective content evaluation revealed notable gaps in content depth, specificity, and evidence-based citations. Sociodemographic factors, including educational background and sex, influenced the presentation of information. Future research should prioritize developing standardized and evidence-based guidelines for chiropractic websites to improve access to online health information and patient education and ensure accurate, reliable health information delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.