Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691586›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

The characterization of frailty in spine surgery: a systematic review of frailty indices.

Alexander Yu, Neerav Kumar, Grace Dydian Xu, Rami Abuqubo, Danyal Ahmed Quraishi, Izzet Akosman, Kyra Kwok, Ibrahim Hussain, Noel Akioyamen, Rafael De La Garza Ramos and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexander YuIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States. alexander.yu@icahn.mssm.edu.
Neerav KumarWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States.
Grace Dydian XuColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, United States.
Rami AbuquboMontefiore Einstein, New York, United States.
Danyal Ahmed QuraishiDrexel University, Philadelphia, United States.
Izzet AkosmanWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States.
Kyra KwokWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States.
Ibrahim HussainWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States.
Noel AkioyamenMontefiore Einstein, New York, United States.
Rafael De La Garza RamosMontefiore Einstein, New York, United States.
Ananth EleswarapuMontefiore Einstein, New York, United States.
Reza YassariMontefiore Einstein, New York, United States.
Mitchell S FourmanMontefiore Einstein, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFrailty is a key predictor of postoperative outcomes in spine surgery, yet its definition varies widely across studies. Most research relies on comorbidity-based indices like the modified frailty index (mFI), overlooking the multidimensional nature of frailty. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify the frailty indices in use, assess their prevalence, and evaluate their association with clinical outcomes.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 34 relevant cohort studies on elective spine procedures using frailty indices. Data were collected on frailty measures, complications, and perioperative events, including non-routine discharge, reoperation, readmission, and mortality.

resultsThe mFI was the most used measure, with mFI-11 (38%) and mFI-5 (29%) being the most common. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score appeared in 9%, while the Adult Spinal Deformity Frailty Index and FRAIL were used in 6%. The Fried Frailty Index and Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale were less frequent (3%). Sarcopenia was assessed in 12% of studies. Frailty was an independent variable in 94%, and complications were reported in 85%. Medical and surgical complications occurred in 67% and 62%, respectively; non-routine discharge in 47%, readmission in 29%, and mortality in 26%.

conclusionWhile mFI-5 and mFI-11 are commonly used, their comorbidity-based approach limits frailty assessment. Future research should prioritize multidimensional indices like the Fried Frailty Index and FRAIL scale, which incorporate functional measures for better risk stratification in spine surgery.

Indexed as

FrailtyOrthopedic ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal DiseasesSpineHumansAgingComorbidityDegenerationFrailtySarcopeniaSpine surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.