Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691585›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

The safety and accuracy of radiation-free spinal navigation using a short, scoliosis-specific BoneMRI-protocol, compared to CT.

Peter P G Lafranca, Yorck Rommelspacher, Sebastian G Walter, Sander P J Muijs, Tijl A van der Velden, Yulia M Shcherbakova, Rene M Castelein, Keita Ito, Peter R Seevinck, Tom P C Schlösser

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peter P G LafrancaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.p.g.lafranca-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6612-1986
Yorck RommelspacherDepartment of Spine Surgery, Krankenhaus der Augustinerinnen, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3541-4700
Sebastian G WalterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6203-8616
Sander P J MuijsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9154-1459
Tijl A van der VeldenDepartment of Radiology, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6993-8767
Yulia M ShcherbakovaDepartment of Radiology, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3521-1767
Rene M CasteleinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6182-0315
Keita ItoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-4072
Peter R SeevinckDepartment of Radiology, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-8575
Tom P C SchlösserDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.p.c.schlosser@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1517-5914

Funding

European Research Council 101020004Scoliosis Research Society 1148271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpinal navigation systems require pre- and/or intra-operative 3-D imaging, which expose young patients to harmful radiation. We assessed a scoliosis-specific MRI-protocol that provides T2-weighted MRI and AI-generated synthetic-CT (sCT) scans, through deep learning algorithms. This study aims to compare MRI-based synthetic-CT spinal navigation to CT for safety and accuracy of pedicle screw planning and placement at thoracic and lumbar levels.

methodsSpines of 5 cadavers were scanned with thin-slice CT and the scoliosis-specific MRI-protocol (to create sCT). Preoperatively, on both CT and sCT screw trajectories were planned. Subsequently, four spine surgeons performed surface-matched, navigated placement of 2.5 mm k-wires in all pedicles from T3 to L5. Randomization for CT/sCT, surgeon and side was performed (1:1 ratio). On postoperative CT-scans, virtual screws were simulated over k-wires. Maximum angulation, distance between planned and postoperative screw positions and medial breach rate (Gertzbein-Robbins classification) were assessed.

results140 k-wires were inserted, 3 were excluded. There were no pedicle breaches > 2 mm. Of sCT-guided screws, 59 were grade A and 10 grade B. For the CT-guided screws, 47 were grade A and 21 grade B (p = 0.022). Average distance (± SD) between intraoperative and postoperative screw positions was 2.3 ± 1.5 mm in sCT-guided screws, and 2.4 ± 1.8 mm for CT (p = 0.78), average maximum angulation (± SD) was 3.8 ± 2.5° for sCT and 3.9 ± 2.9° for CT (p = 0.75).

conclusionMRI-based, AI-generated synthetic-CT spinal navigation allows for safe and accurate planning and placement of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screws in a cadaveric model, without significant differences in distance and angulation between planned and postoperative screw positions compared to CT.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingScoliosisSpinal FusionSurgery, Computer-AssistedThoracic VertebraeTomography, X-Ray ComputedCadaverFemaleHumansMalePedicle ScrewsAI-generatedMRINavigationPedicle screwsRadiation-freeSynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID40691585
PMCPMC12858448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.