ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Early detection of ICU-acquired infections using high-frequency electronic health record data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNosocomial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the ICU. Earlier identification of these complications may facilitate better clinical management and improve outcomes. We developed a dynamic prediction model that leveraged high-frequency longitudinal data to estimate infection risk 48 h ahead of clinically overt deterioration.
methodsWe used electronic health record data from consecutive adults who had been treated for > 48 h in a mixed tertiary ICU in the Netherlands enrolled in the Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis (MARS) cohort from 2011 to 2018. All infectious episodes were prospectively adjudicated. ICU-acquired infection (ICU-AI) risk was estimated using a Cox landmark model with high-resolution vital sign data processed via a convolutional neural network (CNN).
resultsWe studied 32,178 observation days in 4444 patients and observed 1197 infections, yielding an overall infection risk of 3.5% per ICU day. Discrimination of the composite model was moderate with c-index values varying between 0.64 (95%CI: 0.58-0.69) and 0.72 (95%CI: 0.66-0.78) across timepoints, with some overestimation of ICU-AI risk overall (mean calibration slope 0.58). Compared to 38 common features of infection, a CNN risk score derived from five vital sign signals consistently ranked as a strong predictor of ICU-AI across all time points but did not substantially change risk prediction of ICU-AI.
conclusionA dynamic modelling approach that incorporates machine learning of high-frequency vital sign data shows promise as a continuous bedside index of infection risk. Further validation is needed to weigh added complexity and interpretability of the deep learning model against potential benefits for clinical decision support in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.