Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691573›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2025

'A post-test experimental study on the effects of message framing and the use of a patient testimonial on intentions of osteoarthritis patients to adhere to treatment advice'.

J M H Oomen, C H van den Ende, H J Schers, S Koëter, W J J Assendelft, E Das

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J M H OomenDepartment of Research and Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. s.oomen@maartenskliniek.nl.
C H van den EndeDepartment of Research and Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
H J SchersDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
S KoëterOrthopedics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
W J J AssendelftDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
E DasCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, PO Box 9103, 6500 HD, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent findings show that intentions to adhere to conservative treatment of osteoarthritis are negatively influenced by certain beliefs and rely strongly on testimonies of others. Message framing, i.e., focusing on either gains or losses, and the use of a patient testimonial in educational material are commonly used techniques to influence beliefs, and ultimately, health behaviors.

objectivesTo study the effects of 1) message framing and 2) patient testimonials on osteoarthritis patients' beliefs about and intentions to be physically active and to use pain medication.

methodsMembers of a research panel (n=639) with a self-reported diagnosis of knee OA were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to watching one out of four video messages combining a framing condition (gain or loss-frame) with the use of a testimonial (yes/no). After watching this video, participants completed a questionnaire on attitudes, behavioral beliefs, attitudes towards physical activity and pain medication (1=completely disagree, 7=completely agree), and intentions towards physical activity and pain medication (1=I do not do this now and am not planning on doing this, 7=I am doing this already for more than 6 months). ANOVA was used to assess the main and interaction effects.

resultsA total of 154 respondents completed the questionnaire. Message framing and the use of a testimonial did not impact attitudes, beliefs, or intentions on physical activity. However, loss framing resulted in more positive attitudes towards pain medication (mean (SD) 5.5 (1.6)) than gain framing (mean (SD) 4.9 (1.9), mean difference=0.6, 95% CI [0.0, 1.1]). Furthermore, the patient testimonial induced more positive pain medication attitudes (mean (SD) 6.0 (1.1)) than the informative control message (mean (SD) 5.0 (1.7), mean difference=0.9, 95% CI [0.1, 1.6]) when the message used a loss, rather than a gain-frame.

conclusionThis study suggests that describing the disadvantages of nonadherence to pain medication resulted in more positive beliefs about pain medication than stating the advantages of adherence. The use of a patient testimonial within this loss-frame strengthened the effect. Our findings indicate that the use of framing and testimonials in OA care can matter and that healthcare providers should be aware of the potential effects of emphasising either gains or losses in communicating with their patients.

Indexed as

IntentionOsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, KneePatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicAdultAgedFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersuasive CommunicationSurveys and QuestionnairesFramingOsteoarthritis (OA)Pain medicationPhysical activitySelf-managementTestimonialTheory of planned behavior (TPB)

Identifiers

PMID40691573
PMCPMC12278497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.