Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691535›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Cross-generational genomic prediction of Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood properties: an evaluation using independent validation.

Haleh Hayatgheibi, Henrik R Hallingbäck, Salvador A Gezan, Sven-Olof Lundqvist, Thomas Grahn, Gerhard Scheepers, Sonali Sachin Ranade, Katri Kärkkäinen, M Rosario García Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haleh HayatgheibiDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden. haleh.hayatgheibi@slu.se.
Henrik R HallingbäckForestry research Institute Sweden (Skogforsk), Uppsala, 75183, Sweden.
Salvador A GezanVSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Sven-Olof LundqvistIIC, Rosenlundsgatan 48B, Stockholm, 118 63, Sweden.
Thomas GrahnRISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB (RISE), Stockholm, 114 86, Sweden.
Gerhard ScheepersRISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB (RISE), Stockholm, 114 86, Sweden.
Sonali Sachin RanadeDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.
Katri KärkkäinenNatural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE), Oulu, Finland.
M Rosario García GilDepartment of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evaluation of genomic selection (GS) efficiency in forestry has primarily relied on cross-validation schemes that split the same population within a single generation for both training and validation. While useful, this approach may not be reliable for multigenerational breeding. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess genomic prediction in Norway spruce using a large dataset spanning two generations in two environments. We trained pedigree-based (ABLUP) and marker-based (GBLUP) prediction models under three approaches: forward prediction, backward prediction, and across-environment prediction. The models were evaluated for ring-width, solid-wood and tracheid characteristics, using ~ 6,000 phenotyped and ~ 2,500 genotyped individual. Predictive ability (PA) and prediction accuracy (ACC) were estimated using an independent validation method, ensuring no individuals were shared between training and validation datasets. To assess the trade-off between comprehensive radial history and practical direct methods, we compared GBLUP models trained with cumulative area-weighted density (AWE-GBLUP) and single annual-ring density (SAD-GBLUP) from mother plus-trees. These models were validated using early and mature-stage progeny density measurements across two trials.

resultsDespite the smaller number of individuals used in the GBLUP models, both PA and ACC were generally comparable to those of the ABLUP model, particularly for cross-environment predictions. Overall, forward and backward predictions were significantly higher for density-related and tracheid properties, suggesting that across-generation predictions are feasible for wood properties but may be challenging for growth and low-heritability traits. Notably, SAD-GBLUP provided comparable prediction accuracies to AWE-GBLUP, supporting the use of more practical and cost-effective phenotyping methods in operational breeding programs.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the need for context-specific models to improve the accuracy and reliability of genomic prediction in forest tree breeding. Future efforts might aim to expand training populations, incorporate non-additive genetic effects, and validate model performance across cambial ages while accounting for climatic variability during the corresponding growth years. Overall, this study offers a valuable foundation for implementing GS in Norway spruce breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsPiceaWoodGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingCambial ageCross-generationGBLUPGenomic selectionNorway SpruceWood properties

Identifiers

PMID40691535
PMCPMC12278512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.