ArticleCommunications engineering2025
Scorecard for synthetic medical data evaluation.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality Assessment and Model Training Impact of Synthetic Images in Medical Diagnostic Imaging: Systematic Review.JMIR AI · 2026Review
- Language-enhanced generative modeling for amyloid PET synthesis from MRI and blood biomarkers.iScience · 2026Article
- PRISM-G: an interpretable privacy scoring framework for assessing risk in synthetic human genome data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- High-Fidelity Synthetic Data Replicates Clinical Prediction Performance in a Million-Patient Diabetes Cohort.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The Potential of Digital Twins for Pediatric Rare Diseases.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Review
- A call for principle-based acceptance of synthetic patients: establishing the AI-driven foundation for regulatory submissions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Synthetic data in rheumatology: a systematic literature review.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.