ArticleScientific reports2025
Parasite community of the pelagic thresher Alopias pelagicus (Lamniformes) as additional indicator of trophic network status and functioning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The majority of marine parasites are trophically transmitted, exhibiting a complex life cycle, thus, parasite communities investigation is a valuable source of information on trophic network status. Parasite communities of sharks, which have high structural importance within trophic webs, might well be included among bioindicators of trophic network functioning. Here, we present the first study on parasite communities of the pelagic thresher Alopias pelagicus, in the eastern Pacific, a highly biodiverse area, subject to the threat of overfishing. Results indicated that the parasite community exhibited greater richness, abundance, and diversity compared to those reported in other shark species and locations, suggesting that the trophic network in the area may still be resilient to anthropogenic pressures. Differences found among sex, individuals of different size, and across sampling sites with different maximum depths confirmed that both biotic and abiotic factors influence parasite communities, which are known to be sensitive to such variables. Our findings supported the use of parasite communities in high trophic level predators as reliable and effective indicators of the trophic network status, advocating for their inclusion as an additional tool in biodiversity conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.