ArticleScientific reports2025
LARS2 DNA methylation predicts the prognosis in colon cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [MBD1 knockdown inhibits proliferation, migration and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cellsNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Immunoregulatory roles of post-translational modifications in colorectal cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colon cancer is a highly aggressive solid tumor. Because most studies have focused on the intrinsic oncogenic pathways of tumors, we focused on the relationship between DNA methylation genes in the tumor immune microenvironment and colon cancer prognosis. We download RNA-seq data from the TCGA dataset. DNA methylation genes were scored using the GSVA method, and this score was subjected to GSEA, GO and KEGG enrichment analysis. Then, in vitro experiments examined the effect of silencing LARS2 on the proliferation and apoptosis of HCT116 cells. We obtained 2635 genes, 144 were obtained after single factor screening, and 8 genes were obtained through random forest dimensionality reduction. They are LARS2, TEX2, BRIP1, QSOX2, HOOK1, COX19, NEK4 and STXBP4. Survival analysis indicated that patients with high Riskscore had poor prognosis. There were significant differences in the expression of DNA methylation genes between the two groups with high and low Riskscore. The immune checkpoints of different Riskscore groups include Antigen present, Ligand, Receptor, Co-inhibitor, Co-stimulator, Other, and Cell adhesion. There were significant differences in the expression of genes and DNA integrity checkpoint, histone deacetylation, mitotic DNA damage checkpoint, TGF-beta signaling pathway, Platinum drug resistance and Protein processing in endoplasmic reticlum pathway at the level of Antigen present. Silencing of LARS2 decreased the proliferative capacity and increased the apoptosis rate of HCT116. Our findings suggest that LARS2 methylation could affects colon cancer development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.