Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

WASPAS-based multi-expert decision algorithm for physical education using circular pythagorean fuzzy aggregation with prioritized weights.

Dawei Lyu, Xiaoxue Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dawei LyuCollege of Physical Education and Health, East China Jiaotong University, Nan Chang, 330013, Jiangxi, China. lvdawei13330116957@163.com.
Xiaoxue ZhangCollege of Physical Education and Health, East China Jiaotong University, Nan Chang, 330013, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making is a crucial process that involves selecting a course of action from multiple alternatives. It requires evaluating different options, weighing their potential outcomes, and making a choice based on available information and objectives. In physical education, decision-making plays a vital role in instructing teachers and students to interact with each other, facilitating understanding and retention of previously learned material. In this article discusses decision-making in physical education for teaching and learning, aiming to create engaging and inspiring opportunities for students to learn and improve their thinking skills. To achieve this, we utilize a circular Pythagorean fuzzy set (CPyFS), which captures membership and non-membership grades while exhibiting circular behavior. This approach is particularly useful for handling uncertainty in assessment processes, allowing decision-makers ([Formula: see text]) to discuss their opinions within a large domain. The CPyFS technique builds upon fuzzy set (FS) theory, with Pythagorean FS (PyFS) being a special case. Our goal is to define weighted averaging and geometric operators within the CPyFS framework, based on triangular norms. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these aggregation operators (AOs) through examples and establish key mathematical properties, such as idempotency and boundedness. Furthermore, we propose a new model using the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method, exploring its application in multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM). The effectiveness and reliability of this technique are validated through sensitivity analysis and comparative study, showcasing its potential in handling uncertainties in physical education.

Indexed as

Aggregation operatorsCircular pythagorean fuzzy setDecision-making approachPhysical education for teaching and learningWASPAS technique

Identifiers

PMID40691461
PMCPMC12280134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.