ArticleScientific reports2025
WASPAS-based multi-expert decision algorithm for physical education using circular pythagorean fuzzy aggregation with prioritized weights.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decision-making is a crucial process that involves selecting a course of action from multiple alternatives. It requires evaluating different options, weighing their potential outcomes, and making a choice based on available information and objectives. In physical education, decision-making plays a vital role in instructing teachers and students to interact with each other, facilitating understanding and retention of previously learned material. In this article discusses decision-making in physical education for teaching and learning, aiming to create engaging and inspiring opportunities for students to learn and improve their thinking skills. To achieve this, we utilize a circular Pythagorean fuzzy set (CPyFS), which captures membership and non-membership grades while exhibiting circular behavior. This approach is particularly useful for handling uncertainty in assessment processes, allowing decision-makers ([Formula: see text]) to discuss their opinions within a large domain. The CPyFS technique builds upon fuzzy set (FS) theory, with Pythagorean FS (PyFS) being a special case. Our goal is to define weighted averaging and geometric operators within the CPyFS framework, based on triangular norms. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these aggregation operators (AOs) through examples and establish key mathematical properties, such as idempotency and boundedness. Furthermore, we propose a new model using the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) method, exploring its application in multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM). The effectiveness and reliability of this technique are validated through sensitivity analysis and comparative study, showcasing its potential in handling uncertainties in physical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.