Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691456›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Ongoing uncoordinated anthropogenic emission abatement promotes atmospheric new particle growth in a Chinese megacity.

Lizi Tang, Zeyu Feng, Dongjie Shang, Linghan Zeng, Zhijun Wu, Hui Wang, Shiyi Chen, Xin Li, Limin Zeng, Jianlin Hu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lizi Tang *State Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zeyu Feng *State Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Dongjie ShangState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Linghan ZengState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5165-8369
Zhijun WuState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hui WangInstitute of Climate and Energy Systems, Troposphere, ICE-3, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Shiyi ChenState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xin LiState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-4801
Limin ZengState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jianlin HuCollaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-4794
Min HuState Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, International Joint Laboratory of Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China. minhu@pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-9123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric new particle growth in diameter is the crucial process determining air quality effects raised by secondary aerosols. However, uncertain mechanisms and long-term trends of new particle growth limit the assessments of urban air quality evolution. Here we report an increasing trend of new particle growth rate in responds to anthropogenic emission abatement in urban Beijing during autumn from 2017 to 2021. Oxygenated organic vapors is the key compounds driving this variation of growth rate. While the anthropogenic volatile organic precursor abatement has decreased their total concentrations, the concurrent NO

Identifiers

PMID40691456
PMCPMC12280209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.