Trial reportNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2025
Probiotic-mediated modulation of gut microbiome in students exposed to academic stress: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Ecological Engineering of the Human Gut Microbiome: A Narrative Review and Framework for Next-Generation Therapeutics.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Travel-Induced Circadian and Microbiota Disturbances: Implications for Athlete Health and Performance: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Imbalance of the Brain-Gut-Microbiota Axis in Major Depressive Disorder: From Pathogenesis to Clinical Translation.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely tested for their effect on mental well-being, albeit with heterogeneous outcomes. Direct and indirect effects through the gut microbiome might lie at the basis of these observations. Here, in a post-hoc analysis, we assessed the effect of 4-week consumption of a probiotic candidate strain on the gut microbiome in students exposed to academic stress. Healthy students were randomized to consume a fermented milk product with Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 (N = 39) or an acidified non-fermented milk product (N = 40) twice daily for 4 weeks before academic exams. The gut microbiome was analysed by Quantitative Microbiome Profiling based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon and shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Stress and anxiety were assessed using both objective and self-reported markers. Changes of alpha-diversity markers and community shifts from baseline (beta diversity) were lower in L. rhamnosus treated individuals over controls, suggesting lower overall changes of gut microbiota during psychological stress in the Probiotic group. The intake of L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 induced differential abundance of some species, such as the maintenance of the quantitative abundance of Ruminococcus bicirculans, and co-varied with species, which differed according to visits (i.e., stress level), suggesting a potential beneficial effect of the strain before the highest increase of stress level. The higher quantitative abundance of F. prausnitzii induced by the probiotic intake was associated with lowered self-reported anxiety levels before the exam. Functional analysis revealed minor changes upon intake of the probiotic strain. Taken together, using a quantitative framework, we found that L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3690 has a potential effect on gut microbiome response to stress, although further studies are needed to better understand the precise interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.