Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691423›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

The Assessment of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Profile of Young Adults with Specific Learning Disorders: A Network Analysis Approach.

Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohamad Ahmad Saleem KhasawnehSpecial Education Department, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. mkhasawneh@kku.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1390-3765

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP.2 /68 /46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specific learning disorders (SLD) affect 3-17% of the world's population and are associated with significant academic, emotional, and social challenges. This study compared Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) profiles and symptom networks between young adults with SLD and healthy controls. A total of 177 individuals with SLD (including dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia, or combinations thereof) and 200 age-matched controls from Saudi Arabia completed the MMPI-2-RF. Scale scores were compared using independent-samples t-tests, and network analysis was employed to identify central and bridging symptoms. All analyses were conducted in RStudio. Compared with controls, the SLD group scored significantly higher on demoralization (M = 47.0 vs. 44.6), somatic complaints ( M = 47.4 vs. 45.5), dysfunctional negative emotions (M = 41.8 vs. 39.8), and thought dysfunction (M = 52.3 vs. 50.1). In the symptom network, low positive emotions strength = 1.23) and dysfunctional negative emotions (strength = 1.12) emerged as the most central nodes, with strong connections to cynicism (edge = 0.16) and demoralization (edge = 0.22). A negative edge linked ideas of persecution to aberrant experiences (edge = - 0.10). Among personality psychopathology five-revised scales, introversion/low positive emotionality-revised (strength = 0.95) and negative emotionality/neuroticism-revised (strength = 0.89) were most central and were strongly interrelated (edge = 0.28). These findings suggest that targeting core symptoms-such as low positive emotions and introversion-may disrupt maladaptive symptom networks and improve outcomes for individuals with SLD. Clinicians may enhance treatment effectiveness by focusing on these central features.

Indexed as

NeuroticismPersonalityPsychological sistressSpecific learning disorder

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.