Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40691419›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026

The role of gastrointestinal PCR in inflammatory bowel disease flares: A double-edged sword or a diagnostic breakthrough?

Manjeet Kumar Goyal, Elliot Berinstein, Priyata Dutta, Vineet Ahuja, Peter D R Higgins, Jeffrey Berinstein, Shrinivas Bishu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manjeet Kumar GoyalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India.
Elliot BerinsteinDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Priyata DuttaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Trinity Hospital, Ann Arbor, USA.
Vineet AhujaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India.
Peter D R HigginsDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey BerinsteinDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Shrinivas BishuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. bishus@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-5805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, leading to unpredictable flares and substantial morbidity. Gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI-PCR) testing has emerged as a widely used diagnostic tool to identify enteric pathogens during IBD exacerbations. It is a novel, quick and sensitive diagnostic test to detect Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as well as other enteric pathogens. However, the clinical significance of non-C. difficile pathogens detected by GI-PCR remains uncertain, raising concerns about the over-interpretation of positive results and the potential for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. While traditional stool culture and microscopy offered limited sensitivity, GI-PCR has dramatically improved pathogen detection rates, identifying infections in up to 26% of IBD patients compared to 5% with conventional methods. Beyond C. difficile, pathogens such as Escherichia coli (especially adherent-invasive strains), Campylobacter, Salmonella, Norovirus and Yersinia enterocolitica are frequently detected in IBD flares. However, whether these microbes actively drive disease exacerbations or merely reflect inflammation-associated dysbiosis remains unclear. Enterobacteriaceae, in particular, bloom in inflamed intestines, raising critical questions regarding their pathogenic role vs. colonization. The high sensitivity of GI-PCR further complicates clinical decision-making, as distinguishing active infection from harmless microbial presence is challenging. This review explores the current literature on GI-PCR in IBD, emphasizing its benefits and limitations. While GI-PCR provides rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection, its indiscriminate application may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and therapeutic missteps. Understanding the ecological shifts in IBD-associated dysbiosis and refining clinical interpretation of GI-PCR results are essential to optimizing patient management. Future research should aim to delineate the pathogenic significance of non-C. difficile microbes and establish evidence-based protocols for the appropriate use of GI-PCR in IBD care.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesPolymerase Chain ReactionClostridioides difficileCrohn DiseaseFecesHumansEnterobacteriaceaeGI-PCRInflammatory bowel diseaseMicrobiome dysbiosisNon-Clostridioides difficile infections

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.