ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026
The role of gastrointestinal PCR in inflammatory bowel disease flares: A double-edged sword or a diagnostic breakthrough?
Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Corticosteroid Initiation Before Antimicrobials Does Not Increase the Risk of Adverse Outcomes Among Individuals Hospitalized With an IBD Flare and Enteric Infection.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, leading to unpredictable flares and substantial morbidity. Gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI-PCR) testing has emerged as a widely used diagnostic tool to identify enteric pathogens during IBD exacerbations. It is a novel, quick and sensitive diagnostic test to detect Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as well as other enteric pathogens. However, the clinical significance of non-C. difficile pathogens detected by GI-PCR remains uncertain, raising concerns about the over-interpretation of positive results and the potential for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. While traditional stool culture and microscopy offered limited sensitivity, GI-PCR has dramatically improved pathogen detection rates, identifying infections in up to 26% of IBD patients compared to 5% with conventional methods. Beyond C. difficile, pathogens such as Escherichia coli (especially adherent-invasive strains), Campylobacter, Salmonella, Norovirus and Yersinia enterocolitica are frequently detected in IBD flares. However, whether these microbes actively drive disease exacerbations or merely reflect inflammation-associated dysbiosis remains unclear. Enterobacteriaceae, in particular, bloom in inflamed intestines, raising critical questions regarding their pathogenic role vs. colonization. The high sensitivity of GI-PCR further complicates clinical decision-making, as distinguishing active infection from harmless microbial presence is challenging. This review explores the current literature on GI-PCR in IBD, emphasizing its benefits and limitations. While GI-PCR provides rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection, its indiscriminate application may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and therapeutic missteps. Understanding the ecological shifts in IBD-associated dysbiosis and refining clinical interpretation of GI-PCR results are essential to optimizing patient management. Future research should aim to delineate the pathogenic significance of non-C. difficile microbes and establish evidence-based protocols for the appropriate use of GI-PCR in IBD care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40691419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.